Holloman AFB, New Mexico / Norton AFB, California, United States
The Holloman AFB Landing Film Claim
Producer Robert Emenegger and associates said Air Force-linked personnel promised them authentic 16 mm footage of an alleged UFO landing at Holloman AFB for their 1974 documentary, but the promised reel was never delivered. Former Norton AFB audiovisual official Paul Shartle later publicly said he h
Why This Case Matters
A useful corrective disclosure-myth case: there are named on-record claims about a withheld film, but the central physical evidence has never surfaced and the only public 'landing' clip is mundane.
Chronology
- 1971-73 Emenegger/Sandler develop government-linked documentary project
- Air Force-linked contacts allegedly promise Holloman landing footage
- 1974 UFOs: Past, Present and Future released without promised reel, using dramatized sequence
- later Shartle/Emenegger repeat claim publicly
- 1980s AFOSI-linked Holloman-film stories recur
- later frame/location analysis identifies public clip as aircraft/re-enactment footage
The Witnesses
Evidence
The following evidence types are documented for this case:
Conventional explanations: Miscommunication, promotional storytelling and/or deliberate intelligence disinformation are strong alternatives to a suppressed alien-landing film. The repeated promise-without-delivery pattern materially weakens the central claim.
What Remains Unresolved
- Contemporaneous production correspondence/contracts
- Air Force/Norton records naming who made the promise
- any chain-of-custody record for a 16 mm reel
- independent authenticated witness to the alleged original film.
Key Takeaways
- Do not label frames from the 1974 dramatization as genuine UFO footage. The case is evidence of a persistent claim about a film, not evidence that an alien landing occurred.
Sources
Primary and secondary sources for this case file: