THE UAP MAP
Radar · 1952 · Tokyo

A pursuit,
over Haneda.

On 5 August 1952, USAF control-tower operators at Haneda Air Base tracked an object that a pilot pursued. The object identity was never settled.

5 August 1952Haneda Air Base, TokyoRadar contactPilot pursuit
Haneda Air Base, location context
Haneda context (contextual image, not the incident).
Why this case matters

Why This Case Matters

Haneda matters because it is an early military radar-visual case treated by a scientific investigator — yet the object identity remains unresolved.

01 / the radar

A bright light,
on radar.

USAF control-tower operators at Haneda Air Base noticed an unusually bright light and tracked it.

Documented

The tower observation is documented.

02 / the pursuit

A pilot
pursued it.

A pilot was directed to pursue the object. The pursuit is part of the case.

Documented

The pursuit is documented.

03 / the record

James McDonald
treated it.

Atmospheric physicist James McDonald later treated the case in his congressional statement. The object identity remains disputed.

Debated

The object identity is disputed.

04 / the limits

Tower and pilot,
no photograph.

No photograph is established. The case rests on tower and pilot accounts.

Unverified

Any extraterrestrial origin is unverified.

05 / what the evidence establishes

Keep the layers apart.

Record element
What it supports
What it does not settle
Radar/tower
Tower operators tracked a light.
The object identity.
Pursuit
A pilot pursued it.
That the object was extraordinary.
McDonald
A scientist treated the case.
That the case is settled.
06 / source room

Follow the paperwork.
Keep the claims apart.

These sources do different jobs: McDonald’s statement is the scientific treatment, and NICAP is the civilian record. Neither establishes the object identity.

Research recordJames E. McDonald — Statement on Unidentified Flying Objects (1968)

The scientific treatment.

SecondaryNICAP records

The civilian record.